Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles
- Journal
- Langmuir
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/la800305j →Countries where authors are citing Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles
This map shows the geographic impact of Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles
This network shows the impact of Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles.
About Shape- and Size-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity of Gold Nanoparticles
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Huanjun Chen, Xiaoshan Kou, Zhi Yang, Weihai Ni and Jianfang Wang covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (794 citations), Biomedical Engineering (722 citations) and Materials Chemistry (383 citations). Published in Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la800305j.