Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 457 indexed citations. Written by Andrew Kozbial, Zhiting Li, Shonali Dhingra, Vahid Vahdat, Feng Zhou, Brian D’Urso, Haitao Liu and Lei Li covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (221 citations), Biomedical Engineering (163 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (145 citations). Published in Langmuir.

Countries where authors are citing Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Study on the Surface Energy of Graphene by Contact Angle Measurements.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la5018328.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026