Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization
- Authors
- Viatcheslav Freger
- Journal
- Langmuir
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/la020920q →Countries where authors are citing Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization
This network shows the impact of Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization.
About Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization
This paper, published in 2003, received 688 indexed citations . Written by Viatcheslav Freger covering the research area of Water Science and Technology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Water Science and Technology (625 citations), Biomedical Engineering (512 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (257 citations). Published in Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la020920q.