Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 542 indexed citations. Written by Bin Li, Hui‐Min Wen, Wei Zhou and Banglin Chen covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (438 citations), Materials Chemistry (338 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (90 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jz501586e.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026