Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 857 indexed citations. Written by Roberto Peverati and Donald G. Truhlar covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (384 citations), Organic Chemistry (312 citations) and Materials Chemistry (279 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jz201170d.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026