Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
- Authors
- Kazuhiko MaedaKazunari Domen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jz1007966 →Countries where authors are citing Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
This network shows the impact of Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges.
About Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
This paper, published in 2010, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by Kazuhiko Maeda and Kazunari Domen covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (2.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.8k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (679 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jz1007966.