Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp994365l →Countries where authors are citing Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells
This network shows the impact of Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells.
About Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells
This paper, published in 2000, received 991 indexed citations . Written by Nam‐Gyu Park, Jao van de Lagemaat and A. J. Frank covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (847 citations), Materials Chemistry (700 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (186 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp994365l.