Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter
- Authors
- A. W. CastlemanKit H. Bowen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp961030k →Countries where authors are citing Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter
This map shows the geographic impact of Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter
This network shows the impact of Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter.
About Clusters: Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of Intermediate States of Matter
This paper, published in 1996, received 592 indexed citations . Written by A. W. Castleman and Kit H. Bowen covering the research area of Catalysis, Atmospheric Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (417 citations), Materials Chemistry (177 citations) and Spectroscopy (145 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp961030k.