Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches
- Authors
- Dirk BakowiesWalter Thiel
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp9536514 →Countries where authors are citing Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches
This map shows the geographic impact of Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches
This network shows the impact of Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches.
About Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches
This paper, published in 1996, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Dirk Bakowies and Walter Thiel covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (435 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (432 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (241 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp9536514.