Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp952377a →Countries where authors are citing Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+
This map shows the geographic impact of Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+ more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+
This network shows the impact of Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+.
About Photophysical Properties of ZnS Nanoclusters with Spatially Localized Mn2+
This paper, published in 1996, received 600 indexed citations . Written by Kelly Sooklal, S. M. Angel and Catherine J. Murphy covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (578 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (401 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (95 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp952377a.