Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents
- Authors
- Sheng‐Tao YangXin WangHaifang WangFushen LuPengju G. Luo
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp9085969 →Countries where authors are citing Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents
This map shows the geographic impact of Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents
This network shows the impact of Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents.
About Carbon Dots as Nontoxic and High-Performance Fluorescence Imaging Agents
This paper, published in 2009, received 784 indexed citations . Written by Sheng‐Tao Yang, Xin Wang, Haifang Wang, Fushen Lu, Pengju G. Luo, Li Cao, Mohammed J. Meziani, Jiahui Liu, Yuanfang Liu and Min Chen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (743 citations), Biomedical Engineering (192 citations) and Molecular Biology (159 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp9085969.