Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp906827m →Countries where authors are citing Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots
This map shows the geographic impact of Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots
This network shows the impact of Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots.
About Re-examination of the Size-Dependent Absorption Properties of CdSe Quantum Dots
This paper, published in 2009, received 516 indexed citations . Written by Jacek J. Jasieniak, Lisa Smith, Joel van Embden, Paul Mulvaney and Marco Califano covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (467 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (351 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (72 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp906827m.