ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp709896w →Countries where authors are citing ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation
This map shows the geographic impact of ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation
This network shows the impact of ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation.
About ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation
This paper, published in 2008, received 2.1k indexed citations . Written by Kimberly Chenoweth, Adri C. T. van Duin and William A. Goddard covering the research area of Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Materials Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (573 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (374 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp709896w.