Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp405989z →Countries where authors are citing Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis
This network shows the impact of Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis.
About Cation Exchange: A Versatile Tool for Nanomaterials Synthesis
This paper, published in 2013, received 427 indexed citations . Written by Brandon J. Beberwyck, Yogesh Surendranath and A. Paul Alivisatos covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (381 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (264 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (104 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp405989z.