Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp201666s →Countries where authors are citing Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties
This map shows the geographic impact of Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties
This network shows the impact of Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties.
About Fe3O4–Graphene Nanocomposites with Improved Lithium Storage and Magnetism Properties
This paper, published in 2011, received 447 indexed citations . Written by Jing Su, Minhua Cao, Ling Ren and Changwen Hu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (262 citations), Materials Chemistry (248 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (209 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp201666s.