Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp072463y →Countries where authors are citing Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art
This map shows the geographic impact of Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art
This network shows the impact of Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art.
About Aqueous Synthesis of Thiol-Capped CdTe Nanocrystals: State-of-the-Art
This paper, published in 2007, received 640 indexed citations . Written by Andrey L. Rogach, T. Franzl, Thomas A. Klar, Jochen Feldmann, Nikolai Gaponik, Vladimir Lesnyak, Alexey Shavel, Alexander Eychmüller, Yury P. Rakovich and John F. Donegan covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (600 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (395 citations) and Molecular Biology (130 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp072463y.