A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 511 indexed citations. Written by Haripriya E. Prakasam, Karthik Shankar, Maggie Paulose, Oomman K. Varghese and Craig A. Grimes covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (363 citations), Materials Chemistry (317 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (115 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

Countries where authors are citing A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A New Benchmark for TiO2 Nanotube Array Growth by Anodization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp070273h.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026