Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp061667w →Countries where authors are citing Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited
This map shows the geographic impact of Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited
This network shows the impact of Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited.
About Turkevich Method for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Johannes Kimling, Monika Maier, Vassilios Kotaidis and Anton Plech covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (870 citations), Materials Chemistry (836 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (637 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp061667w.