New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp0581126 →Countries where authors are citing New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms
This map shows the geographic impact of New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms
This network shows the impact of New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms.
About New Relativistic ANO Basis Sets for Transition Metal Atoms
This paper, published in 2005, received 951 indexed citations . Written by Björn O. Roos, Roland Lindh, Per‐Åke Malmqvist, Valera Veryazov and Per‐Olof Widmark covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (441 citations), Materials Chemistry (431 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (352 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp0581126.