Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp057528g →Countries where authors are citing Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water
This map shows the geographic impact of Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water
This network shows the impact of Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water.
About Evolution of Polyaniline Nanotubes: The Oxidation of Aniline in Water
This paper, published in 2006, received 405 indexed citations . Written by Miroslava Trchová, Ivana Šeděnková, Elena N. Konyushenko, Jaroslav Stejskal, Petr Holler and Gordana Ćirić‐Marjanović covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics, Bioengineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (370 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (258 citations) and Bioengineering (138 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp057528g.