Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp037247d →Countries where authors are citing Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism
This map shows the geographic impact of Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism
This network shows the impact of Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism.
About Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds: H-Atom versus Electron Transfer Mechanism
This paper, published in 2004, received 580 indexed citations . Written by Monica Leopoldini, Tiziana Marino, Nino Russo and Marirosa Toscano covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (409 citations), Biochemistry (250 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (94 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp037247d.