Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 680 indexed citations. Written by Pratim Kumar Chattaraj, Buddhadev Maiti and Utpal Sarkar covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (507 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (225 citations) and Materials Chemistry (116 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Countries where authors are citing Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Philicity:  A Unified Treatment of Chemical Reactivity and Selectivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp034707u.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026