Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 870 indexed citations. Written by David M. Adams, Louis E. Brus, Christopher E. D. Chidsey, Stephen E. Creager, Carol Creutz, Cherie R. Kagan, Prashant V. Kamat, Marya Lieberman, Stuart Lindsay and R. A. Marcus covering the research area of Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (588 citations), Materials Chemistry (437 citations) and Electrochemistry (187 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Countries where authors are citing Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale:  Current Status.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp0268462.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026