Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp0009305 →Countries where authors are citing Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires
This map shows the geographic impact of Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires
This network shows the impact of Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires.
About Doping and Electrical Transport in Silicon Nanowires
This paper, published in 2000, received 763 indexed citations . Written by Yi Cui, Xiangfeng Duan, Jiangtao Hu and Charles M. Lieber covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (609 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (525 citations) and Materials Chemistry (335 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp0009305.