Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 683 indexed citations. Written by D. Bradley G. Williams and Michelle Lawton covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (300 citations), Materials Chemistry (240 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (131 citations). Published in The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Drying of Organic Solvents: Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Several Desiccants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jo101589h.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026