A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3
- Authors
- Herbert C. Brown
- Journal
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jo01356a003 →Countries where authors are citing A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3
This map shows the geographic impact of A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3
This network shows the impact of A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3.
About A Quantitative Treatment for Electrophilic Reactions of Aromatic Derivatives1-3
This paper, published in 1957, received 137 indexed citations . Written by Herbert C. Brown covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (111 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (40 citations) and Spectroscopy (20 citations). Published in The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jo01356a003.