THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY

581 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1955, received 581 indexed citations. Written by John E. Leffler covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Electrochemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (299 citations), Materials Chemistry (127 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (110 citations). Published in The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY more than expected).

Fields of papers citing THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the THE ENTHALPY-ENTROPY RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIC CHEMISTRY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jo01126a009.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026