Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects
- Journal
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jm990412m →Countries where authors are citing Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects
This map shows the geographic impact of Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects
This network shows the impact of Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects.
About Protease Inhibitors: Current Status and Future Prospects
This paper, published in 2000, received 740 indexed citations . Written by Donmienne Leung, Giovanni Abbenante and David P. Fairlie covering the research area of Cancer Research, Oncology and Hematology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (484 citations), Organic Chemistry (273 citations) and Oncology (167 citations). Published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jm990412m.