Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Journal
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jm7009364 →Countries where authors are citing Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases
This map shows the geographic impact of Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases
This network shows the impact of Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases.
About Multi-target-Directed Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases
This paper, published in 2008, received 947 indexed citations . Written by Andrea Cavalli, María Laura Bolognesi, Anna Minarini, Michela Rosini, Vincenzo Tumiatti, Maurizio Recanatini and Carlo Melchiorre covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (710 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (465 citations) and Organic Chemistry (316 citations). Published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jm7009364.