A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design

620 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 620 indexed citations. Written by Brett R. Beno, Kap‐Sun Yeung, Michael D. Bartberger, Lewis D. Pennington and Nicholas A. Meanwell covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (373 citations), Molecular Biology (174 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (132 citations). Published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jm501853m.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026