In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes
- Journal
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jm050015d →Countries where authors are citing In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes
This map shows the geographic impact of In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes
This network shows the impact of In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes.
About In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes
This paper, published in 2005, received 716 indexed citations . Written by C. Scolaro, Alberta Bergamo, L. Brescacin, Riccarda Delfino, Moreno Cocchietto, Gábor Laurenczy, T.J. Geldbach, Gianni Sava and Paul J. Dyson covering the research area of Oncology and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (596 citations), Organic Chemistry (542 citations) and Molecular Biology (140 citations). Published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jm050015d.