Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
- Authors
- Zi‐Xian ChenQian ChengXi‐Yao LiZheng LiYun‐Wei Song
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c02786 →Countries where authors are citing Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
This network shows the impact of Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries.
About Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
This paper, published in 2023, received 188 indexed citations . Written by Zi‐Xian Chen, Qian Cheng, Xi‐Yao Li, Zheng Li, Yun‐Wei Song, Furong Sun, Meng Zhao, Xue‐Qiang Zhang, Bo‐Quan Li and Jia‐Qi Huang covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (183 citations), Automotive Engineering (61 citations) and Materials Chemistry (50 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c02786.