Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07655 →Countries where authors are citing Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries
This network shows the impact of Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries.
About Single-Atom Yttrium Engineering Janus Electrode for Rechargeable Na–S Batteries
This paper, published in 2022, received 182 indexed citations . Written by Erhuan Zhang, Xiang Hu, Lingzhe Meng, Min Qiu, Junxiang Chen, Yangjie Liu, Guiyu Liu, Zechao Zhuang, Xiaobo Zheng and Lirong Zheng covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (157 citations), Materials Chemistry (78 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (33 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07655.