Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07178 →Countries where authors are citing Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions
This map shows the geographic impact of Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions
This network shows the impact of Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions.
About Dynamic Stability of Copper Single-Atom Catalysts under Working Conditions
This paper, published in 2022, received 210 indexed citations . Written by Xiaowan Bai, Xunhua Zhao, Yehui Zhang, Chongyi Ling, Yipeng Zhou, Jinlan Wang and Yuanyue Liu covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (178 citations), Materials Chemistry (108 citations) and Catalysis (78 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07178.