Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses

517 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 517 indexed citations. Written by Arnab Chatterjee, John P. Morgan, Matthias Scholl and Robert H. Grubbs covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (501 citations), Molecular Biology (215 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (60 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synthesis of Functionalized Olefins by Cross and Ring-Closing Metatheses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja9939744.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026