The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja993972j →Countries where authors are citing The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons
This map shows the geographic impact of The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons
This network shows the impact of The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons.
About The Magnitude of the CH/π Interaction between Benzene and Some Model Hydrocarbons
This paper, published in 2000, received 493 indexed citations . Written by Seiji Tsuzuki, Kazumasa Honda, Tadafumi Uchimaru, Masuhiro Mikami and Kazutoshi Tanabe covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (207 citations), Spectroscopy (166 citations) and Organic Chemistry (166 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja993972j.