Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja974112a →Countries where authors are citing Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding
This map shows the geographic impact of Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding
This network shows the impact of Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding.
About Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding
This paper, published in 1998, received 691 indexed citations . Written by F.H. Beijer, Rint P. Sijbesma, H. Kooijman, Anthony L. Spek and E. W. Meijer covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (433 citations), Biomaterials (273 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (227 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja974112a.