Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

5.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 5.3k indexed citations. Written by Paul von Ragué Schleyer, Christoph Maerker, Alk Dransfeld, Haijun Jiao and Nicolaas J. R. van Eikema Hommes covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (4.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.0k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (1.1k citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja960582d.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026