Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja902972w →Countries where authors are citing Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework
This map shows the geographic impact of Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework
This network shows the impact of Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework.
About Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc−Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework
This paper, published in 2009, received 949 indexed citations . Written by Jihyun An, Steven J. Geib and Nathaniel L. Rosi covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (819 citations), Materials Chemistry (559 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (208 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja902972w.