MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja805545x →Countries where authors are citing MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties
This map shows the geographic impact of MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties more than expected).
Fields of papers citing MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties
This network shows the impact of MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties.
About MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual Electronic and Magnetic Properties
This paper, published in 2008, received 873 indexed citations . Written by Yafei Li, Zhen Zhou, Shengbai Zhang and Zhongfang Chen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (842 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (299 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (87 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja805545x.