Countries where authors are citing Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates.

About Mononuclear Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Polyoxometalates

This paper, published in 2008, received 786 indexed citations . Written by Murad A. AlDamen, J.M. Clemente-Juan, Eugenio Coronado, Carlos Martí‐Gastaldo and Alejandro Gaita‐Ariño covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (752 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (602 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (300 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja801659m.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026