Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja8008192 →Countries where authors are citing Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst
This map shows the geographic impact of Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst
This network shows the impact of Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst.
About Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanotubes on the Activity of Fischer−Tropsch Iron Catalyst
This paper, published in 2008, received 697 indexed citations . Written by Wei Chen, Zhongli Fan, Xiulian Pan and Xinhe Bao covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (482 citations), Catalysis (375 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (232 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja8008192.