Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja800570d →Countries where authors are citing Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
This map shows the geographic impact of Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
This network shows the impact of Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging.
About Molecular Rotor Measures Viscosity of Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
This paper, published in 2008, received 675 indexed citations . Written by Marina K. Kuimova, Gökhan Yahioglu, James A. Levitt and Klaus Suhling covering the research area of Bioengineering, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (368 citations), Spectroscopy (316 citations) and Molecular Biology (183 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja800570d.