Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja503016b →Countries where authors are citing Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules
This map shows the geographic impact of Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules
This network shows the impact of Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules.
About Photoswitching Using Visible Light: A New Class of Organic Photochromic Molecules
This paper, published in 2014, received 444 indexed citations . Written by Sameh Helmy, Frank A. Leibfarth, Saemi Oh, Justin E. Poelma, Craig J. Hawker and Javier Read de Alaniz covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (384 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (203 citations) and Organic Chemistry (150 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja503016b.