Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 726 indexed citations. Written by Xiaopeng Wang, Jiagang Wu, Dingquan Xiao, Jianguo Zhu, Xiaojing Cheng, Ting Zheng, Binyu Zhang, Xiaojie Lou and Xiangjian Wang covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (699 citations), Biomedical Engineering (481 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (398 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Giant Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate Lead-Free Ceramics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja500076h.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026