ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger

268 indexed citations
published 2012

Countries where authors are citing ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger.

About ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger

This paper, published in 2012, received 268 indexed citations . Written by Jonathan C. Barnes, Michal Jurı́ček, Nathan L. Strutt, Marco Frasconi, Srinivasan Sampath, Marc A. Giesener, Psaras L. McGrier, Carson J. Bruns, Charlotte L. Stern and Amy A. Sarjeant covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (182 citations), Materials Chemistry (153 citations) and Spectroscopy (99 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja307360n.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026