On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja207229n →Countries where authors are citing On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries
This network shows the impact of On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries.
About On the Efficacy of Electrocatalysis in Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries
This paper, published in 2011, received 591 indexed citations . Written by Bryan D. McCloskey, R. Scheffler, Angela Speidel, Donald S. Bethune, R. M. Shelby and A. C. Luntz covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (579 citations), Automotive Engineering (176 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (76 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (50 citations) and Materials Chemistry (27 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja207229n.