Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja110482r →Countries where authors are citing Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites
This map shows the geographic impact of Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites
This network shows the impact of Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites.
About Nb2O5·nH2O as a Heterogeneous Catalyst with Water-Tolerant Lewis Acid Sites
This paper, published in 2011, received 502 indexed citations . Written by Kiyotaka Nakajima, Yusuke Baba, Masaaki Kitano, Junko N. Kondo, Shigenobu Hayashi and Masahiko Hara covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (305 citations), Materials Chemistry (261 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (137 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja110482r.