Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 477 indexed citations. Written by Anne Lesage, Moreno Lelli, David Gajan, Marc A. Caporini, Veronika Vitzthum, Pascal Miéville, Johan G. Alauzun, Arthur Roussey, Chloé Thieuleux and Ahmad Mehdi covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (394 citations), Materials Chemistry (316 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (91 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja104771z.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026