Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja103431d →Countries where authors are citing Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster
This map shows the geographic impact of Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster
This network shows the impact of Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster.
About Mechanochromic and Thermochromic Luminescence of a Copper Iodide Cluster
This paper, published in 2010, received 486 indexed citations . Written by Sandrine Perruchas, X.F. Le Goff, Sébastien Maron, Isabelle Maurin, F. Guillen, Alain Garcia, Thierry Gacoin and Jean‐Pierre Boilot covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (391 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (160 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (154 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja103431d.